|
| | | |
A Collaborative Guidance Case Study
Stevenson, D., Li, J., Smith, J. and Hutchins, M.
This paper reports on a collaborative guidance case study,
which investigated the use of remote pointing and
drawing technologies in a system designed for spatially
focussed collaborative tasks. Four guidance technologies
were available to the participants - pointing and drawing
over video of the remote site and pointing and drawing
into the remote workplace itself. The experimental task
was designed to mimic the actions observed in an actual
application setting. The purpose of the study was to see
how the participants would use the technology and how
they would collaborate with each other during the
performance of the task.
Specifically, the experiment looked at how the
participants selected from the choice of guidance
technology, and changed their selection, as the task
progressed. It looked at how they used the technology
and how they created working, 3-dimensional, shared
frames of reference for the task. Finally it explored the
way the system supported emerging collaborative
behaviour between each pair of participants.
The paper concludes that the participants were able to
make reasoned choices about their selection of guidance
technology, and that they evolved effective guidance
strategies as the task progressed. They adapted their
understanding of each other's frame of reference with
respect to the task by focusing on reference objects
created during the task. Finally, the paper concludes that
the experimental system did indeed foster emerging
collaborative behaviour between the participants. |
Cite as: Stevenson, D., Li, J., Smith, J. and Hutchins, M. (2008). A Collaborative Guidance Case Study. In Proc. Ninth Australasian User Interface Conference (AUIC 2008), Wollongong, NSW, Australia. CRPIT, 76. Plimmer, B. and Weber, G., Eds. ACS. 33-42. |
(from crpit.com)
(local if available)
|
|