Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology
  

Online Version - Last Updated - 20 Jan 2012

 

 
Home
 

 
Procedures and Resources for Authors

 
Information and Resources for Volume Editors
 

 
Orders and Subscriptions
 

 
Published Articles

 
Upcoming Volumes
 

 
Contact Us
 

 
Useful External Links
 

 
CRPIT Site Search
 
    

An Argument Structure Abstraction for Bayesian Belief Networks: Just Outcomes in On-line Dispute Resolution

Muecke, N. and Stranieri, A.

    There are many different approaches for settling disputes on-line, such as simple email systems, fixed bid systems and intelligent systems. However, to date there have been no attempts to integrate decision support methods into the dispute resolution process for the purpose of supporting outcomes that are consistent with judicial reasoning. This paper describes how a model of judicial reasoning can be used to assist divorcees with the resolution of property issues online, in a manner that is consistent with decisions a judge would make if the matter was heard in Court. The approach uses an argument based model of the discretionary nature of decisions made by judges in Australian Family Law. This is integrated with a protocol for online dispute dialogue. Predictions of the likelihood of alternates outcomes is achieved with a series of Bayesian Belief Networks.
Cite as: Muecke, N. and Stranieri, A. (2007). An Argument Structure Abstraction for Bayesian Belief Networks: Just Outcomes in On-line Dispute Resolution. In Proc. Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM2007), Ballarat, Australia. CRPIT, 67. Roddick, J. F. and Hinze, A., Eds. ACS. 35-40.
pdf (from crpit.com) pdf (local if available) BibTeX EndNote GS
 

 

ACS Logo© Copyright Australian Computer Society Inc. 2001-2014.
Comments should be sent to the webmaster at crpit@scem.uws.edu.au.
This page last updated 16 Nov 2007